In fact, it´s far more convenient to index a straight folder hierarchy like the one in Photolab. It wasn´t an easy decision to go back again because I think the C1 sessions system is more complicated to use in a DAM-structure, since it relies on its own folder hierarchy. I also liked that Photolab is using the core filesystems folders straight on without any cumbersome import processes like Lightroom and C1. I did like Joachim and am back with C1 again after many years with Photolab but once I went the other way just like Joachim because at that time, I felt Photolab was more efficient and also had better denoise. Malcolm, is there any special reason why you are thinking of migrating? So far I haven’t regret both steps, it was interesting to see “how it’s done in another valley”, but comparing both apps I have no reason to continue with DxO products.Īnd I’m no subscriber of C1, I bought my licenses both in DxO as in C1 for one version. I also came from C1, tried PL and after the last version of PL didn’t improve what I missed, I went back to C1. If you’re using catalog functions of Capture One you need to prepare to do the image management with another tool as PL rather sucks in this area. Worse, once you eventually find out Capture One might be the smaller p.i.t.a., there’s also no way to get PL’s edits into C1. There’s no way to transfer C1 edits to DxO else than export all edited images and lose the abilities to re-edit. If a combination is not supported it can take extremely long (and sosmetimes long as in “never”) to get support for a certain combo. If you use PL trial version like suggests make sure to try out all your lenses and all your bodies as PL relies on “home-grown” sensor- and lens profiles.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |